Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Immigrants to Spain are mainly from low- and middle-income countries, and around 20% are children. Absolute eosinophilia is defined as >0.45×109 eosinophilic leucocytes/L of peripheral blood. Absolute eosinophilia in travelers and immigrants from tropical and sub-tropical areas is frequently associated with parasitic diseases. However, the significance of relative eosinophilia in immigrant children, defined as >5% eosinophilic leucocytes in those with <0.45×109 eosinophils/L, is unresolved.Objectives: To describe the importance of relative eosinophilia in a cohort of immigrant children (<18 years) from sub-Saharan Africa, North Africa and Latin America.Methods: 176 immigrant children without absolute eosinophilia were prospectively evaluated.Results: 25 of them (14.2%) had relative eosinophilia. 10 patients with relative eosinophilia had no diagnosis. 15 with relative eosinophilia (60%) were diagnosed with a parasitic disease, 7 (46.7%) of whom had only one parasite, while co-infection accounted for 8 of the 15 cases (53.3%). Of the parasitic infections, the most frequent causes of relative eosinophilia were filariasis spp. (7/15, 46.7%), strongyloides spp. (5/15, 33.3%), schistosoma spp. (4/15, 26.6%) and Ascaris lumbricoides (2/15, 13.3%).Conclusion: The findings suggest that relative eosinophilia is frequently associated with helminthic infection in immigrant children from tropical and sub-tropical areas, so a thorough parasitological study is highly advisable in this group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belhassen‐García et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: