Why the study?
Whether goal-directed fluid therapy provides any outcome benefit compared to non-goal-directed fluid therapy in elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery had not yet been determined.
Does goal-directed fluid therapy improve gastrointestinal recovery and reduce length of hospital stay compared to non-goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery?
Does goal-directed fluid therapy improve gastrointestinal recovery and reduce length of hospital stay compared to non-goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery?
Goal-directed fluid therapy enhances gastrointestinal recovery and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery.
GDFT may hasten GI recovery after laparoscopic abdominal surgery; extends prior evidence specifically to this setting.
(1) Background: Whether goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) provides any outcome benefit as compared to non-goal-directed fluid therapy (N-GDFT) in elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery has not been determined yet. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus. The main outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOHS), time to first flatus and stool, intraoperative fluid and vasopressor requirements, serum lactate levels, and urinary output. Pooled risks ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. (3) Results: Eleven studies were included in the quantitative, and fifteen in the qualitative synthesis. LOHS (WMD: −1.18 days, 95% CI: −1.84 to −0.53) and time to first stool (WMD: −9.8 h; CI −12.7 to −7.0) were significantly shorter in the GDFT group. GDFT resulted in significantly less intraoperative fluid administration (WMD: −441 mL, 95% CI: −790 to −92) and lower lactate levels at the end of the operation: WMD: −0.25 mmol L−1; 95% CI: −0.36 to −0.14. (4) Conclusions: GDFT resulted in enhanced recovery of the gastrointestinal function and shorter LOHS as compared to N-GDFT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Virág et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: