Why the study?
What are the technologies, efficacy, and limitations of new minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring devices in the perioperative setting?
What are the technologies, efficacy, and limitations of new minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring devices in the perioperative setting?
This review highlights the need for clinicians to familiarize themselves with emerging minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring technologies to understand their indications and limitations in perioperative care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant clinician familiarization with emerging monitors; leaves open their comparative efficacy in perioperative care.
In Brief With advancing age and increased co-morbidities in patients, the need for monitoring devices during the perioperative period that allow clinicians to track physiologic variables, such as cardiac output (CO), fluid responsiveness and tissue perfusion, is increasing. Until recently, the only tool available to anesthesiologists to monitor CO was either a pulmonary artery catheter or transesophageal echocardiograph. These devices have their limitations and potential for morbidity. Several new devices (including esophageal Doppler monitors, pulse contour analysis, indicator dilution, thoracic bioimpedance and partial non-rebreathing systems) have recently been marketed which have the ability to monitor CO noninvasively and, in some cases, assess the patient’s ability to respond to fluid challenges. In this review, we will describe these new devices including the technology, studies on their efficacy and the limitations of their use. IMPLICATIONS: Due to the rapid increase in the number of devices that measure CO noninvasively, clinicians need to familiarize themselves with the technologies and available literature to appreciate the proven indications and the questions that remain to be answered to determine the roles of each technology in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Funk et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: