This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Organosilyl exchange reactions of the extremely electronrich and formally “antiaromatic” 1,4‐bis(trimethylsilyl)‐substituted 1,4‐dihydropyrazine 1 with Ph 3 SiCl or Me 5 Si 2 Cl yielded the new compounds 2 and 3 with triarylsilyl and disilanyl substituents. At δ = 4.53 in CDCl 3 compound 3 shows a particularly high‐field shifted 1 H‐NMR resonance for the 1,4‐dihydropyrazine protons. In contrast to the planar ring arrangement of 1,4‐bis(triisopropylsilyl)‐1,4‐dihydropyrazine 4 , the crystal structure determination of the 2,5‐dimethylated analogue 5 as obtained by reductive silylation exhibits a pronounced boat conformation of the heterocycle due to steric repulsion between the substituents, the closest H…H (CH 3 / CH) contact being 211 pm. Despite the sizeable structural differences between 4 and 5 both compounds are reversibly oxidized at very negative potentials, at ‐0.90 and ‐0.85 V vs. Fc + /0, respectively, It appears that the electrochemical behavior of this class of compounds is determined ***primarly by the configuration at the nitrogen centers and less by the ring conformation. Compound 4 reacts with C 60 under EPR‐detectable electron exchange to afford 4 +* and C . The radical cation 4 +* generated separately via oxidation with iodine was characterized by low‐temperature UV/Vis and ENDOR spectroscopy. An ENDOR spectrum revealing silylalkyl coupling was also obtained for the related radical cation of reversibly oxidizable 1,1′ ‐bis( tert ‐butyldimethylsilyl)‐1,1′,4,4′ ‐bipyridylidene (8 ).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lichtblau et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: