Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates mating-type-dependent biofilm specialization in Candida albicans, indicating distinct architectural adaptations for infection versus sexual reproduction.
Candida albicans forms two types of biofilm in RPMI 1640 medium, depending upon the configuration of the mating type locus. In the prevalent a/α configuration, cells form a biofilm that is impermeable, impenetrable by leukocytes, and fluconazole resistant. It is regulated by the Ras1/cyclic AMP (cAMP) pathway. In the a/a or α/α configuration, white cells form a biofilm that is architecturally similar to an a/α biofilm but, in contrast, is permeable, penetrable, and fluconazole susceptible. It is regulated by the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway. The MTL-homozygous biofilm has been shown to facilitate chemotropism, a step in the mating process. This has led to the hypothesis that specialized MTL-homozygous biofilms facilitate mating. If true, then MTL-homozygous biofilms should have an advantage over MTL-heterozygous biofilms in supporting mating. We have tested this prediction using a complementation strategy and show that minority opaque a/a and α/α cells seeded in MTL-homozygous biofilms mate at frequencies 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than in MTL-heterozygous biofilms. No difference in mating frequencies was observed between seeded patches of MTL-heterozygous and MTL-homozygous cells grown on agar at 28°C in air or 20% CO2 and at 37°C. Mating frequencies are negligible in seeded patches of both a/α and a/a cells, in contrast to seeded biofilms. Together, these results support the hypothesis that MTL-homozygous (a/a or α/α) white cells form a specialized "sexual biofilm."
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: