Why the study?
The prevalence of residual cardiovascular pathology by CMR, ambulatory rhythm monitoring, and CPET in patients approximately 6 months after MIS-C was unknown.
Do patients treated for MIS-C have residual cardiovascular pathology at 6 months, and does it differ based on the presence of acute myocardial injury?
Do patients treated for MIS-C have residual cardiovascular pathology at 6 months, and does it differ based on the presence of acute myocardial injury?
A high prevalence of residual cardiovascular abnormalities is seen ∼6 months after MIS-C, regardless of whether myocardial injury was apparent during the acute illness, supporting routine cardiology follow-up for all patients.
Residual CMR abnormalities common at 6 months post-MIS-C even without initial injury; leaves open need for routine advanced imaging follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of residual cardiovascular pathology by cardiac MRI (CMR), ambulatory rhythm monitoring, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in patients ∼6 months after multisystem inflammatory disease in children (MIS-C). METHODS: Patients seen for MIS-C follow-up were referred for CMR, ambulatory rhythm monitoring, and CPET ∼6 months after illness. Patients were included if they had ≥1 follow-up study performed by the time of data collection. MIS-C was diagnosed on the basis of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Myocardial injury during acute illness was defined as serum Troponin-I level >0.05 ng/mL or diminished left ventricular systolic function on echocardiogram. RESULTS: Sixty-nine of 153 patients seen for MIS-C follow-up had ≥1 follow-up cardiac study between October 2020-June 2022. Thirty-seven (54%) had evidence of myocardial injury during acute illness. Of these, 12 of 26 (46%) had ≥1 abnormality on CMR, 4 of 33 (12%) had abnormal ambulatory rhythm monitor results, and 18 of 22 (82%) had reduced functional capacity on CPET. Of the 37 patients without apparent myocardial injury, 11 of 21 (52%) had ≥1 abnormality on CMR, 1 of 24 (4%) had an abnormal ambulatory rhythm monitor result, and 11 of 15 (73%) had reduced functional capacity on CPET. The prevalence of abnormal findings was not statistically significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of abnormal findings on follow-up cardiac studies and lack of significant difference between patients with and without apparent myocardial injury during hospitalization suggests that all patients treated for MIS-C warrant cardiology follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zimmerman et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: