Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Context: Despite of potential adverse effects, the use of herbal medicines has grown globally without proper regulatory measures. There is a scarcity of data on the pattern of use and general awareness towards herbal products among the Jordanians. Aims: To assess the prevalence, utilization, and attitude toward herbal medicines among the Jordanian public. Methods: A national cross-sectional self-reported survey on a random sample of adult population aged ≥ 18 years was conducted over two months to include 1820 adults in Jordan. A representative sample was collected using a proportionate random sampling technique, which enabled us to categorize the study population geographically. SPSS V26 was used for data analysis. Results: The prevalence of herbal medicine use was 53.3% (971/1820), and respondents who aged >29 years were more likely to use herbal products. Predictors for using herbal products were: females (OR 4.23; 95%CI 1.97-9.55; p=0.0004), fair health status (OR 7.19; 95%CI 5.49-13.85; p=0.0001), and participants without chronic diseases were significantly less likely to use herbal medicines (OR 0.21; 95%CI 0.11-0.61; p=0.0007). The majority of respondents (86.5%, 1574/1820) thought herbal products were safe because they were made from natural ingredients. The most common reasons for using herbal products were chronic disease treatments (41.9%, 407/971), weight reduction (23.6%, 229/971), and to less extent improving the well-being (16.2%, 157/971). Conclusions: More than half of the targeted population used herbal medicines, a quarter of whom experienced adverse effects. The findings of this study have major community health implications for Jordan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdel‐Qader et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: