This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Using DUS characters five composite varieties of maize (Super -1 composite, Composite-6, Composite-8, Composite-14 and Composite-15) were characterised through morphological features of the plant and the seed utilising fifteen descriptive characters. The identification keys based on plant and seed morphology were prepared. All the varieties could be distinguished on the basis of morphological features of the plant, only three could be identified on the basis of seed characteristics. The keys could be used to define parameters of certification and allow for determining similarities and differences in DUS (Distinctness, uniformity and Stability) testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasseer et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: