Standard wisdom holds that in order for a use of a definite description to be felicitous, its referent must be `familiar', either because it was mentioned in previous discourse or because it is otherwise salient in the non-linguistic context. I show that a grammatically-defined class of demonstrably definite NPs containing definite possessors (e.g., that man's daughter) are routinely able to describe novel (unfamiliar) entities. I propose to account for this systematic class of exceptions to the standard familiarity requirement by providing a refined notion of familiarity, one that determines when a use of a possessed NP as a whole will count as familiar based (in part) on whether its possessor phrase counts as familiar. 3 1. Introduction Most modern discourse representation theories begin with some version of the following assumption: in order for a use of a definite description to be felicitous, the entity referred to by that description must be familiar from previous discourse. U...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chris Barker (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: