Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 1, 2025Theoretical LinguisticsOpen Access

Mapping the pragmatic field: in how many ways?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

VHVirginia Hill

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Review highlights syntax's role in pragmatic models, suggesting a lack of comprehensive cross-linguistic formalization.

Key Points

  • Syntax impacts pragmatic models, revealing gaps in cross-linguistic formalization.
  • Key observation shows superficial differences in empirical support for interaction-based models.
  • Review of neo-performative theoretical frameworks comparing pragmatic elements with syntax.
  • Highlights the need for a more comprehensive approach to understanding pragmatic fields across languages.

Cite This Study

Virginia Hill (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69254f97c0ce034ddc359db9https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2025-2011
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1No one-to-one mapping between typologies of pragmatic relations and models of pragmatic processing: a case study with mentalizing.2025 · 5 citations
  2. 2Pragmatics in TESOL2026
  3. 3Towards an interdisciplinary definition of pragmatics2026
  4. 4Pragmatics beyond humans: meaning, communication, and LLMs2025 · 2 citations
  5. 5Pragmatic Development2025