Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A state increment method of life-cycle cost analysis (SILCCA) is presented for project-level evaluation of highway infrastructure maintenance options. The method involves: (1) Characterization of facility's physical and functional characteristics into discrete states; (2) specification of treatment alternatives for each state; (3) prediction of facility life-cycle performance as a series of state transitions; and (4) application of dynamic programming for life-cycle cost analysis. Four important advantages of SILCCA are: (1) A systematic procedure is used to identify treatment alternatives based on assessed condition; (2) engineering expertise is used to capture the effect of treatments on pavement condition and in turn improve the accuracy of prediction; (3) analytical and computational efficiency over traditional, Markov, and semi-Markov methods; and (4) a convenient framework for integration with network-level optimization methods. Based on the findings of a case study, it is concluded that SILCCA is systematic, accurate, and efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravirala et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: