Interpretive mixed-method study uncovers contrasting transition visions between experts and residents in west Wales, highlighting opportunities for co-creative governance.
Hydrogen megaprojects are increasingly central to national and regional decarbonisation strategies, yet the expert‐led imaginaries driving them often overlook the lived meanings and relations of the communities in which they are embedded. This paper examines how hydrogen futures are envisioned at the Port of Milford Haven (PMH) in west Wales, a focal point for United Kingdom and Welsh hydrogen ambitions. Drawing on Buck's (2022) concept of ‘double unseeing’, we use an interpretive, mixed‐method design combining documentary analysis, digital ethnography and deliberative workshops to explore how experts and residents construct distinct but interdependent visions of place, risk and transition. Expert narratives emphasise industrial regeneration and geophysical interdependence, whereas community participants foreground ecological and social care rooted in coastal identity. Across these differences, we identify glimpses of recognition—partial alignments that reveal opportunities for more responsive and co‐creative forms of governance. We argue that recognising such moments requires moving beyond distributive framings of just transition towards a relational ethics of shared reliance, attentive to the social and emotional infrastructures that sustain both industrial and community futures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: