Why the study?
Does knowledge-based 3D reconstruction from echocardiography accurately measure right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease?
Does knowledge-based 3D reconstruction from echocardiography accurately measure right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease?
Knowledge-based 3D reconstruction from echocardiography provides reliable measurements of right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in adults with congenital heart disease, correlating well with cardiac magnetic resonance.
May support KBR as a feasible bedside option for RV monitoring in adult CHD; leaves open larger validation before replacing CMR.
AIM: Assessment of right ventricular (RV) function is a challenge, especially in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). The aim of the present study is to assess whether knowledge-based RV reconstruction, used in the everyday practice of an echo-lab for adult CHD in a tertiary referral center, is accurate when compared to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult patients who would undergo CMR for assessment of the RV were asked to undergo an echo of the heart for further knowledge-based reconstruction (KBR). Echocardiographic images were acquired in standard views using a predefined imaging protocol. RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) calculated using knowledge-based technology were compared with the CMR data of the same patient. RESULTS: Nineteen consecutive patients with congenital right heart disease were studied. Median age of the patients was 28 years (range 46 years). Reconstruction was possible in 16 out of 19 patients (85%). RV volumes assessed with this new method were smaller than with CMR. Indexed end diastolic volumes were 114±17 ml vs 121±19 ml, P<0.05 and EFs were 45±8% vs 47±9%, P<0.05 respectively. The correlation between the methods was good with an intraclass correlation of 0.84 for EDV and 0.89 for EF, P value <0.001 in both cases. CONCLUSION: KBR enables reliable measurement of RVs in patients with CHDs and can be used in clinical practice for analysis of volumes and EFs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trzebiatowska‐Krzynska et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: