OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between growth (birth to age 2 years) and developmental outcomes in children born with very low birthweight (VLBW). DESIGN: Motor and mental development in children born with VLBW were regressed on anthropometric measurements at birth, 9 months and 2 years using multivariable regression. SETTING: The Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort, a longitudinal cohort, community sample, designed to be representative of children born across the USA. PATIENTS: 950 children born with VLBW (<1500 g). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Motor and cognitive scores on the Bayley Scales at 9 months and 24 months chronological age. RESULTS: A high proportion of children exhibited poor growth, with length-for-age z-scores <-2 (ie, stunting) in 21.3% of children at 9 months (adjusted for prematurity) and 34.2% of children at 2 years. Compared with children having z-scores >-2, children with growth shortfalls in head circumference, length and weight had a higher adjusted OR (aOR) of low Bayley motor scores at 9 months and 2 years (aOR ranging from 1.8 to 3.3, all p<0.05), while low Bayley cognitive scores were predicted by 9-month deficits in length and weight (aOR 2.0 and 2.4, respectively, both p<0.01) and 2-year deficits in length and head circumference (aOR 2.9 and 2.8, both p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Anthropometric measures of growth were linked to current and future neurodevelopmental outcomes in children born with VLBW. While careful length measures may be a particularly useful marker, deficits in all anthropometric measures were risk factors for developmental delays.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scharf et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: