Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thermally conductive fillers are usually employed in the preparation of rubber composites to enhance thermal conductivity. In this work, ethylene‐propylene‐diene monomer rubber (EPDM)/expanded graphite (EG) and EPDM/graphite composites with up to 100 phr filler loading were prepared. Compared to EPDM/graphite compounds with the same filler loading, stronger filler network was demonstrated for EPDM/EG compounds. Thermal conductivity and mechanical properties of EPDM/graphite and EPDM/EG composites were compared and systematically investigated as a function of the filler loading. The thermal conductivity of both EPDM/graphite and EPDM/EG composites increased with increasing volume fraction of fillers, and could be well fitted by Geometric Mean Model. The thermal conductivity as high as 0.910 W · m −1 · K −1 was achieved for the EPDM/EG composite with 25.8 vol% EG, which was ∼4.5 times that of unfilled EPDM. Compared to EPDM/graphite composites, EPDM/EG composites exhibited much more significant improvement in thermal conductivity and mechanical properties, which could be well correlated with the better filler‐matrix interfacial compatibility and denser structure in EPDM/EG composites, as revealed in the SEM images of tensile fracture surfaces. POLYM. COMPOS., 38:870–876, 2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: