Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The water binding potential (WBP) and expressible moisture (EM) curves of ground rainbow trout white muscle versus pH are different, particularly in the region from pH 5.0 to 7.0. The effect of different salts such as CaCl2, Mg Cl2, NaCl, Nal and Na2SO4 on WBP suggests that for the same salts, cations cause a smaller change than anions. On the other hand, the EM measurements suggest that cations have a greater effect on this measurement than anions. In the case of WBP, the effect of tripolyphosphate and pyrophosphate can be attributed solely to their effect on pH. These results indicate the differences between the two methods and suggest that they measure different components of the water retention properties of a complex system, and thus water holding capacity measurements must be interpreted with care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Regenstein et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: