Why the study?
Does primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolysis provide better outcomes in patients with evolving Q-wave myocardial infarction?
Does primary coronary angioplasty or thrombolysis provide better outcomes in patients with evolving Q-wave myocardial infarction?
This review discusses the comparative effectiveness of primary angioplasty versus thrombolysis for restoring antegrade flow in evolving Q-wave myocardial infarction.
Thrombolytic benefit in acute MI is established by large RCTs; leaves open whether primary angioplasty is superior.
In the past 20 years, pathological and arteriographic studies have shown that Q-wave myocardial infarction is caused by an occlusive thrombus in a coronary artery. The primary therapeutic objective in a patient with an evolving Q-wave myocardial infarction is the prompt restoration of antegrade flow in the occluded artery. Since both immediate (so-called primary) coronary angioplasty and thrombolysis can restore antegrade flow in most occluded coronary arteries, there is disagreement about which approach is better for evolving infarction.In placebo-controlled, randomized trials involving almost 60,000 patients, thrombolytic therapy has been shown to limit infarct size, improve left ventricular function, and . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lange et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: