Key result
Graded exercise up to 150 W significantly decreased the normalized radial pulse Area from 38 at rest to 34, while raw pulse amplitude increased, with these changes reversing during recovery.
Why the study?
How do radial arterial pulse characteristics change during exercise and recovery in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=65)
No
How do radial arterial pulse characteristics change during exercise and recovery in healthy subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 34% vs 38%
p-value: p=<0.05
This study provides quantitative evidence of how radial arterial pulse waveform characteristics adapt to varying exercise loads and recovery in healthy individuals.
These pulse changes during exercise should not yet alter practice; leaves open their role in dynamic cardiovascular monitoring.
It is physiologically important to understand the arterial pulse waveform characteristics change during exercise and recovery. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive investigation. This study aimed to provide scientific evidence on the arterial pulse characteristics change during exercise and recovery. Sixty-five healthy subjects were studied. The exercise loads were gradually increased from 0 to 125 W for female subjects and to 150 W for male subjects. Radial pulses were digitally recorded during exercise and 4-min recovery. Four parameters were extracted from the raw arterial pulse waveform, including the pulse amplitude, width, pulse peak and dicrotic notch time. Five parameters were extracted from the normalized radial pulse waveform, including the pulse peak and dicrotic notch position, pulse Area, Area1 and Area2 separated by notch point. With increasing loads during exercise, the raw pulse amplitude increased significantly with decreased pulse period, reduced peak and notch time. From the normalized pulses, the pulse Area, pulse Area1 and Area2 decreased, respectively, from 38 ± 4, 61 ± 5 and 23 ± 5 at rest to 34 ± 4, 52 ± 6 and 13 ± 5 at 150-W exercise load. During recovery, an opposite trend was observed. This study quantitatively demonstrated significant changes of radial pulse characteristics during different exercise loads and recovery phases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Healthy subjects (n=65). Graded exercise load vs. Resting baseline (0 W) was evaluated on Normalized radial pulse Area (p=<0.05). Graded exercise up to 150 W significantly decreased the normalized radial pulse Area from 38 at rest to 34, while raw pulse amplitude increased, with these changes reversing during recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: