Concomitant left atrial appendage electric isolation and occlusion during persistent AF ablation significantly increased freedom from AF at 12 months compared to ablation alone (95% vs 63%, P=0.036).
RCT (n=62)
Absolute Event Rate: 95% vs 63%
p-value: p=0.036
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) electric isolation is reported to improve persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation outcomes. However, loss of LAA mechanical function may increase thromboembolic risk. Concomitant LAA electric isolation and occlusion as part of conventional AF ablation has never been tested in humans. We therefore evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of LAA electric isolation and occlusion in patients undergoing long-standing persistent AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with long-standing persistent AF (age, 68±7 years; left atrium diameter, 46±3 mm; and AF duration, 25±15 months) underwent AF ablation, LAA electric isolation, and occlusion. Outcomes were compared with a balanced (1:2 ratio) control group who had AF ablation alone. Among 22 patients who underwent ablation, LAA electric isolation was possible in 20. Intraprocedural LAA reconnection occurred in 17 of 20 (85%) patients, predominantly at anterior and superior locations. All were reisolated. LAA occlusion was successful in all 20 patients. There were no major periprocedural complications. Imaging at 45 days and 9 months confirmed satisfactory device position and excluded pericardial effusion. One of twenty (5%) patients had a gap of ≥5 mm requiring anticoagulation. Nineteen of twenty (95%) patients stopped warfarin at 3 months. Without antiarrhythmic drugs, freedom from AF at 12 months after a single procedure was significantly higher in the study group (19/20, 95%) than in the control group (25/40, 63%), P=0.036. Freedom from atrial arrhythmias was demonstrated in 12 of 20 (60%) and 18 of 20 (90%) patients after 1 and ≤2 procedures (mean, 1.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent AF ablation, LAA electric isolation, and mechanical occlusion can be performed concomitantly. This technique may improve the success of persistent AF ablation while obviating the need for chronic anticoagulation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02028130.
Panikker et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (n=62). Left atrial appendage electric isolation and occlusion vs. AF ablation alone was evaluated on Freedom from AF at 12 months without antiarrhythmic drugs (p=0.036). Concomitant left atrial appendage electric isolation and occlusion during persistent AF ablation significantly increased freedom from AF at 12 months compared to ablation alone (95% vs 63%, P=0.036).