Key result
Sex-specific equations significantly reduced the percentage error of estimated maximum oxygen uptake to -0.9% in men and -1.7% in women, compared to -3.4% and -14.7% respectively with the modified ACSM equation (p < 0.01).
Why the study?
Do sex-specific equations reduce the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry compared to general equations in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,715)
No
Do sex-specific equations reduce the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry compared to general equations in adults?
Sex-specific equations significantly reduce the estimation error of VO2max during lower limb cycle ergometry compared to standard general equations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sex-specific equations may improve VO2max estimation accuracy in cycle ergometry; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error. METHODS: This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN). RESULTS: Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN: -29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1 (p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was: -3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and -0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN: -14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM); -6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and -1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Adults undergoing clinical exercise testing (n=1,715). Sex-specific equations (C-MEN and C-WOMEN) vs. Modified ACSM equation was evaluated on Percentage error (E%) between measured and estimated VO2max (p=<0.01). Sex-specific equations significantly reduced the percentage error of estimated maximum oxygen uptake to -0.9% in men and -1.7% in women, compared to -3.4% and -14.7% respectively with the modified ACSM equation (p < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: