Key result
A 3D free-breathing, motion-corrected T2 mapping approach yielded similar myocardial T2 values (37.7 vs 38.0 ms, P=0.99) compared to a 2D breath-held approach.
Absolute Event Rate: 37.7% vs 38%
p-value: p=0.99
A novel 3D free-breathing, motion-corrected whole heart T2 mapping approach at 3.0T can be performed within 5 minutes with accuracy similar to standard 2D breath-held techniques.
Supports preclinical cardiac T2 mapping without breath-holds; leaves open human translation and clinical validation.
PURPOSE: To develop and test a time-efficient, free-breathing, whole heart T2 mapping technique at 3.0T. METHODS: ECG-triggered three-dimensional (3D) images were acquired with different T2 preparations at 3.0T during free breathing. Respiratory motion was corrected with a navigator-guided motion correction framework at near perfect efficiency. Image intensities were fit to a monoexponential function to derive myocardial T2 maps. The proposed 3D, free breathing, motion-corrected (3D-FB-MoCo) approach was studied in ex vivo canine hearts and kidneys, healthy volunteers, and canine subjects with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). RESULTS: Ex vivo T2 values from proposed 3D T2 -prep gradient echo were not different from two-dimensional (2D) spin echo (P = 0.7) and T2 -prep balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) (P = 0.7). In healthy volunteers, compared with 3D-FB-MoCo and breath-held 2D T2 -prep bSSFP (2D-BH), non-motion-corrected (3D-FB-Non-MoCo) myocardial T2 was longer, had a larger coefficient of variation (COV), and had a lower image quality (IQ) score (T2 = 40.3 ms, COV = 38%, and IQ = 2.3; all P < 0.05). Conversely, the mean and COV and IQ of 3D-FB-MoCo (T2 = 37.7 ms, COV = 17%, and IQ = 3.5) and 2D-BH (T2 = 38.0 ms, COV = 15%, and IQ = 3.8) were not different (P = 0.99, P = 0.74, and P = 0.14, respectively). In AMI, T2 values and edema volumes from 3D-FB-MoCo and 2D-BH were closely correlated (R(2) = 0.88 and 0.96, respectively). CONCLUSION: The proposed whole heart T2 mapping approach can be performed within 5 min with similar accuracy to that of the 2D-BH T2 mapping approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2015) studied Acute myocardial infarction. 3D free-breathing motion-corrected (3D-FB-MoCo) T2 mapping vs. 2D breath-held T2 mapping (2D-BH) was evaluated on Myocardial T2 value (ms) (p=0.99). A 3D free-breathing, motion-corrected T2 mapping approach yielded similar myocardial T2 values (37.7 vs 38.0 ms, P=0.99) compared to a 2D breath-held approach.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: