Key result
Surgical treatment in elderly patients with symptomatic severe valvular heart disease was associated with a significantly higher 5-year survival rate of 76.8% compared to 42.9% with conservative treatment.
Why the study?
Does surgical treatment improve long-term survival in elderly patients (≥75 years) with symptomatic severe valvular heart disease compared to conservative treatment?
Cohort (n=181)
No
Does surgical treatment improve long-term survival in elderly patients (≥75 years) with symptomatic severe valvular heart disease compared to conservative treatment?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support surgical evaluation in symptomatic elderly patients; leaves open confirmation via randomized trials.
The aim of this study was to determine how older age and co-morbidities affect the treatment decision-making and long-term survival in elderly patients with symptomatic severe valvular heart diseases.A total of 181 elderly patients (mean age, 78.4 ± 3.4 years) hospitalized between January 2003 and June 2012 with symptomatic severe valvular heart diseases were enrolled. Cardiac and geriatric factors associated with treatment decision-making were analyzed. Survival outcomes were investigated.Surgical treatment was performed in 116 (64%) patients (surgical group) and 65 patients (36%) were treated conservatively (conservative group). The most common [62% (40/65)] reason for refusing surgical treatment was high operative risk as assessed by the physicians who initially cared for the patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified female gender, chronic renal insufficiency, older age, pneumonia, and emergent status as independent predictors of the conservative treatment. Patients with isolated aortic valve disease tended to undergo an operation. Overall 5-year survival in the surgical group was 76.8% versus 42.9% in the conservative group (P < 0.0001). After matching using the propensity score, the surgical group still had a better long-term survival than the conservative group (P = 0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed conservative treatment as the single risk factor associated with poor long-term survival in all series.Approximately 40% of the elderly patients with symptomatic severe heart valve disease were treated conservatively despite a definite indication for surgical intervention. Cardiac and geriatric co-morbidities profoundly affect the treatment decision-making. Interdisciplinary discussion should be encouraged to optimize therapeutic options for elderly patients with valvular heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic severe valvular heart diseases (n=181). Surgical treatment vs. Conservative treatment was evaluated on Overall 5-year survival (p=<0.0001). Surgical treatment in elderly patients with symptomatic severe valvular heart disease was associated with a significantly higher 5-year survival rate of 76.8% compared to 42.9% with conservative treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: