Key result
Octogenarians undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement had lower operative mortality than septuagenarians (0% vs. 7.4%, p=0.029) despite higher predicted preoperative risk.
Why the study?
Does age ≥80 years compared to 70-79 years affect mortality in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement?
Cohort (n=183)
Does age ≥80 years compared to 70-79 years affect mortality in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement?
Octogenarians undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement had lower operative mortality and similar 5-year survival compared to septuagenarians, despite higher predicted preoperative risk.
Questions age-based risk assumptions for isolated AVR; leaves open selection bias in this observational cohort.
BACKGROUND: Demand for aortic valve intervention remains high, and together with the recent introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, this motivates a review of surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly recipients. METHODS: Consecutive patients over 70 years of age having isolated aortic valve replacement during 2007-11 were retrospectively identified and divided into 70-79 and ≥ 80 years age groups for analyses. RESULTS: 62 octogenarians and 121 septuagenarians were eligible. Among octogenarians, a lower proportion were in Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class 3-4 (3.2% vs. 14.0%, p = 0.022) and fewer had diabetes (11.3% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.034), but a higher proportion had infective endocarditis (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.012), and EuroSCORE II was higher (4.9% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Despite this, operative mortality was lower in octogenarians (0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.029), although hospital stay (11.7 vs. 8.9 days, p = 0.026) was longer. One-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 95.2%, 90.1%, and 75.3% for octogenarians and 89.2%, 81.7%, and 70.2% for septuagenarians (p = 0.398). Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class 3-4 and the presence of other valvular stenosis or regurgitation were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSION: Octogenarians had lower operative mortality despite a higher predicted risk preoperatively. Other factors beyond age and EuroSCORE, such as frailty, may be important in deciding whether elderly patients should undergo aortic valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Aortic valve disease requiring replacement (n=183). Age ≥ 80 years (octogenarians) vs. Age 70-79 years (septuagenarians) was evaluated on Operative mortality (p=0.029). Octogenarians undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement had lower operative mortality than septuagenarians (0% vs. 7.4%, p=0.029) despite higher predicted preoperative risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: