Key result
Planetary Health Diet adherence shows no significant link to reduced cardiovascular disease risk.
Why the study?
Unhealthy diets are a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, prompting investigation into whether adherence to the EAT-Lancet Commission's Planetary Health Diet is associated with CVD risk.
Does higher adherence to the Planetary Health Diet reduce the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in healthy adults?
Cohort (n=18,656)
Does higher adherence to the Planetary Health Diet reduce the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in healthy adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Adherence to the Planetary Health Diet did not translate to a significant reduction in cardiovascular events in a generally healthy, young Spanish cohort, underscoring the need for standardized dietary scoring frameworks.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Noncommunicable diseases, particularly cardiovascular disease (CVD), represent a significant global public health challenge, with unhealthy diets as a major risk factor. This study investigates the association between adherence to the Planetary Health Diet proposed by the EAT-Lancet Commission and CVD risk. METHODS: Utilizing data from the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) cohort, which included 18,656 participants (mean age 38 years; 61% women), we assessed dietary intake using a validated food frequency questionnaire and the Planetary Health Diet Index to evaluate adherence (range 0-42). CVD was defined as new-onset stroke, myocardial infarction, or CVD death. RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 11.5 years, 220 cases of CVD were identified. Higher adherence to the Planetary Health Diet revealed no statistically significant reduction in CVD risk associated with the diet. Cox proportional hazard models indicated a trend towards lower CVD risk in the highest adherence quartile, but this did not reach significance (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-1.18, p-trend = 0.127). Sensitivity analyses corroborated these results. Discrepancies in previous studies highlight the complexity of dietary assessments and underscore the need for standardized scoring systems. CONCLUSIONS: In a large Spanish cohort, adherence to the Planetary Health Diet showed no significant reduction in CVD risk. Further research is needed to reach a consensus on the operational definition of the Planetary Health Diet and to clarify the relationship between diet and CVD risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guzmán-Castellanos et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Free of prior cardiovascular disease (n=18,656). High adherence to the Planetary Health Diet (EAT-Lancet Commission) vs. Low adherence to the Planetary Health Diet was evaluated on New-onset cardiovascular disease (composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or CVD death) (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-1.18, p=p-trend = 0.127). Higher adherence to the Planetary Health Diet did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease compared to lower adherence.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: