Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present paper develops three predictive models for daily total ozone concentration over Arosa, Switzerland. The models are artificial neural network, multiple linear regression, and persistence forecast. Each model was judged for their predictive ability using analysis of variance, Pearson correlation study, and scatterplot analysis. Prediction errors were computed for each model. After painstaking analysis it was established that artificial neural network produces better forecasts than the statistical approaches like multiple linear regression and persistence forecast models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chattopadhyay et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: