Why the study?
Does a lifestyle intervention addressing the obesogenic environment improve waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk factors in residential patients with severe mental illness?
Does a lifestyle intervention addressing the obesogenic environment improve waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk factors in residential patients with severe mental illness?
Targeting the obesogenic environment in residential psychiatric facilities yields short-term reductions in waist circumference and metabolic risk, but these effects attenuate over 12 months.
Short-term waist circumference and metabolic improvements from environmental changes in SMI residential care are not sustained at 12 months; leaves open strategies for maintenance.
Background For patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in residential facilities, adopting a healthy lifestyle is hampered by the obesity promoting (obesogenic) environment. Aims To determine the effectiveness of a 12-month lifestyle intervention addressing the obesogenic environment with respect to diet and physical activity to improve waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk factors v. care as usual (Dutch Trial Registry: NTR2720). Method In a multisite cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial, 29 care teams were randomised into 15 intervention (365 patients) and 14 control teams (371 patients). Intervention staff were trained to improve the obesogenic environment. Results Waist circumference decreased 1.51 cm (95% CI −2.99 to −0.04) in the intervention v. control group after 3 months and metabolic syndrome z-score decreased 0.22 s.d. (95% CI −0.38 to −0.06). After 12 months, the decrease in waist circumference was no longer statistically significantly different (–1.28 cm, 95% CI −2.79 to 0.23, P = 0.097). Conclusions Targeting the obesogenic environment of residential patients with SMI has the potential to facilitate reduction of abdominal adiposity and cardiometabolic risk, but maintaining initial reductions over the longer term remains challenging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Looijmans et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: