Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized double-blind trial demonstrates lobeglitazone improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by dual therapy, suggesting a potent triple-therapy option.
AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding lobeglitazone to a triple therapy regimen in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes whose blood glucose levels were inadequately controlled despite dual therapy with metformin and sitagliptin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study involved 231 Korean patients with type 2 diabetes whose HbA1c levels ranged from 7.0% to 10.0% despite treatment with metformin (≥1000 mg/day) and sitagliptin (100 mg/day). Participants received lobeglitazone (0.5 mg/day) or placebo for 24 weeks, followed by a 28-week open-label phase in which all patients received lobeglitazone. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at 24 weeks; secondary endpoints included changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), HOMA for β-cell function (HOMA-β), quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI) and lipid profile. Safety assessments were also conducted. RESULTS: At week 24, lobeglitazone treatment demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c compared with placebo (-1.00% ± 0.09% vs. 0.02% ± 0.09%), with a between-group difference in the adjusted mean change [-1.03%; p < 0.0001]. Additionally, lobeglitazone significantly reduced FPG compared with placebo at week 24 and improved HOMA-IR, HOMA-β and QUICKI. Lipid parameters were also improved by lobeglitazone administration. Adverse events were similar in both treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of lobeglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin and sitagliptin is a beneficial therapeutic option, not only providing effective glycaemic control but also improving insulin function such as sensitivity and enhancing certain lipid parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: