Theoretical analysis reveals how polycentric governance mitigates algorithmic domination in local communities, suggesting pathways for decentralized political self-organization.
We analyze how the processes of democratic backsliding and post-scarcity autarchy have become entangled with digital technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI), to become drivers for the disempowerment of individuals and communities. This is especially in relation to the selection, modification, and application of their own preferences for social arrangements or for managing matters of local public interest. Alternatively, we articulate a new architecture of re-empowerment, which integrates ideas of polycentric governance, ethical platformization, and the embodiment of deep social knowledge in human-AI coworking and coproduction. We argue that this will enable communities to mitigate AI-driven forms of domination and enhance new modes and mechanics of political self-organization for democratized neighborhoods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pitt et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: