Key result
The BDI-II and the PHQ are more efficient than other established tools for early depression assessment in hospitalized cardiac patients.
Why the study?
Which depression assessment tools are most efficient for early detection in hospitalized cardiac patients?
Which depression assessment tools are most efficient for early detection in hospitalized cardiac patients?
The BDI-II and PHQ are recommended as efficient tools for early depression assessment in hospitalized cardiac patients.
May support BDI-II/PHQ selection for cardiac inpatient screening; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
It is highly recommended to promptly assess depression in heart disease patients as it represents a crucial risk factor which may result in premature deaths following acute cardiac events and a more severe psychopathology, even in cases of subsequent nonfatal cardiac events. Patients and professionals often underestimate or misjudge depressive symptomatology as cardiac symptoms; hence, quick, reliable, and early mood changes assessments are warranted. Failing to detect depressive signals may have detrimental effects on these patients' wellbeing and full recovery. Choosing gold-standard depression investigations in cardiac patients that fit a hospitalised cardiac setting well is fundamental. This paper will examine eight well established tools following Italian and international guidelines on mood disorders diagnosis in cardiac patients: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Cognitive Behavioural Assessment Hospital Form (CBA-H), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the two and nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2, PHQ-9), the Depression Interview and Structured Hamilton (DISH), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D/HRSD), and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Though their strengths and weaknesses may appear to be homogeneous, the BDI-II and the PHQ are more efficient towards an early depression assessment within cardiac hospitalised patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceccarini et al. (2014) conducted a review in Heart disease. Depression assessment tools (BDI-II, PHQ, etc.) was evaluated. The BDI-II and the PHQ are more efficient than other established tools for early depression assessment in hospitalized cardiac patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: