Key result
The modified hierarchical transformation model incorporating contour information more accurately estimated left ventricular myocardial displacement than the original model, reducing mean absolute distance error for landmark A from 1.82 mm to 0.47 mm.
Why the study?
Does a modified hierarchical transformation model improve the accuracy of LV myocardial strain and strain rate extraction from cardiac cine-MRI compared to the original model?
Does a modified hierarchical transformation model improve the accuracy of LV myocardial strain and strain rate extraction from cardiac cine-MRI compared to the original model?
A modified hierarchical transformation model incorporating endocardial and epicardial contour information improves the accuracy of LV myocardial strain and strain rate extraction from standard 2D cine-MRI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine LV strain extraction from cine-MRI; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Different from other indicators of cardiac function, such as ejection fraction and transmitral early diastolic velocity, myocardial strain is promising to capture subtle alterations that result from early diseases of the myocardium. In order to extract the left ventricle (LV) myocardial strain and strain rate from cardiac cine-MRI, a modified hierarchical transformation model was proposed. METHODS: A hierarchical transformation model including the global and local LV deformations was employed to analyze the strain and strain rate of the left ventricle by cine-MRI image registration. The endocardial and epicardial contour information was introduced to enhance the registration accuracy by combining the original hierarchical algorithm with an Iterative Closest Points using Invariant Features algorithm. The hierarchical model was validated by a normal volunteer first and then applied to two clinical cases (i.e., the normal volunteer and a diabetic patient) to evaluate their respective function. RESULTS: Based on the two clinical cases, by comparing the displacement fields of two selected landmarks in the normal volunteer, the proposed method showed a better performance than the original or unmodified model. Meanwhile, the comparison of the radial strain between the volunteer and patient demonstrated their apparent functional difference. CONCLUSIONS: The present method could be used to estimate the LV myocardial strain and strain rate during a cardiac cycle and thus to quantify the analysis of the LV motion function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gan et al. (2015) studied Left ventricular dysfunction / Diabetic cardiomyopathy (n=2). Modified hierarchical transformation model (with contour information) vs. Original hierarchical transformation model was evaluated on Mean absolute distance error for Landmark A (in millimeters). The modified hierarchical transformation model incorporating contour information more accurately estimated left ventricular myocardial displacement than the original model, reducing mean absolute distance error for landmark A from 1.82 mm to 0.47 mm.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: