The inhibitory effects of anti‐tumor, bacterial filament forming platinum compounds, Cis‐Pt(II) (NH 3 ) 2 Cl 2 (A), Cis‐Pt(IV) (NH 3 ) 2 Cl 4 (B), and Pt(II) (NH 2 ) 2 (CH 2 ) 2 Cl 2 (C) on DNA, RNA and protein syntheses was measured by the incorporation of 3 H‐thymidine, 3 H‐uridine, and 3 H‐L‐leucine, respectively, into an acid‐insoluble polymer in human amnion AV 3 cells. Compound A, the most effective tumor‐inhibiting platinum compound, was shown to selectively inhibit DNA synthesis below 5μM and to inhibit 3 H‐thymidine incorporation more rapidly than 3 H‐uridine or 3 H‐leucine incorporation at 25μM. Like A, compounds B and C were also shown to inhibit all three processes after a 24‐hour period of treatment at 25μM. A correlation was established between the relative anti‐tumor effectiveness of compounds A, B, and C and the extent of their inhibitory effects. On the other hand, two non‐tumor‐inhibiting platinum compounds, [Pt(II) (NH 3 ) 4 ]Cl 2 (D) and Trans‐Pt(IV) (NH 3 ) 2 Cl 4 (E) had no inhibitory effects, except compound E, which exhibited a rapid initial inhibition of 3 H‐L‐leucine incorporation at 100μM. The inhibition of 3 H‐thymidine incorporation into cells pretreated 4 h with 5μM of compounds A, B, and C was shown to be irreversible. Finally the inhibition of the incorporation of 3 H‐thymidine into DNA by A was shown not to be caused by the inhibition of the uptake of the tracer into the acid‐soluble pool. A number of possible explanations for the greater sensitivity of DNA synthesis and the sequential inhibition of DNA, RNA and protein synthesis at higher concentrations are suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harder et al. (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: