Key result
Combining 2D-STE-derived global longitudinal strain with dobutamine stress echocardiography improved diagnostic accuracy for significant CAD to 90% with an AUC of 0.9.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether 2D speckle tracking echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography improves diagnostic accuracy in young patients with intermediate pretest probability for coronary artery disease and no prior cardiovascular events.
Does combining 2D-STE-derived GLS with DSE improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant CAD in patients with intermediate pretest probability compared to DSE alone?
Observational (n=101)
Does combining 2D-STE-derived GLS with DSE improve diagnostic accuracy for detecting significant CAD in patients with intermediate pretest probability compared to DSE alone?
Adding 2D-STE-derived global longitudinal strain to dobutamine stress echocardiography significantly improves sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy for detecting CAD in patients with intermediate pretest probability.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine CAD detection on stress echo; leaves open need for prospective validation before routine adoption.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies confirmed the feasibility of 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (2D STE) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in assessing myocardial ischemia in patients with previous myocardial infarction. It is unknown whether it improves the diagnostic accuracy in young patients with intermediate pretest probability for coronary artery disease (CAD) and no prior cardiovascular events. METHODS: We prospectively studied 101 patients by DSE and STE, followed by coronary angiography within 1 month. Significant CAD was defined as diameter stenosis ≥ 50%. Receiver operating characteristic analysis obtained global longitudinal strain (GLS) cutoff values of significant area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Mean age: 53 ± 8 years, 56% females, 49 had significant CAD (group 1) and 52 had normal/mild CAD (group 2); no significant baseline differences except more males in group 1 (P: .002). DSE sensitivity and specificity for CAD were 79.6% and 92.3%, respectively, positive predictive value (PPV): 90.6%, negative predictive value (NPV): 82.7%, and diagnostic accuracy: 86%. At peak stress, all strain parameters were significantly lower in group 1. However, GLS had the highest AUC: 0.88, P: <.001. GLS cutoff value ≤ -20.5 had 89.8% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity, 84.6% PPV, 89.8% NPV, and 87% diagnostic accuracy. Combining GLS cutoff with DSE had higher AUC than either alone (0.9, P < .001): 95.9% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity, 85.5% PPV, 95.7% NPV, and 90% diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: 2D-STE-derived GLS increases DSE precision to detect CAD in intermediate pretest probability patients: It improves DSE sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy. It is reproducible and has comparable specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elamragy et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=101). 2D-STE-derived global longitudinal strain (GLS) combined with dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) vs. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) alone was evaluated on Significant CAD (diameter stenosis ≥ 50%) (AUC 0.9, p=<.001). Combining 2D-STE-derived global longitudinal strain with dobutamine stress echocardiography improved diagnostic accuracy for significant CAD to 90% with an AUC of 0.9.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: