Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates high inter-observer agreement and strong correlation between Dorbala grading, SPECT/CT SUVmax, and cardiac MRI findings in suspected cardiac amyloidosis, indicating clinical feasibility.
We aimed to evaluate the reliability and feasibility of visual grading systems and various quantitative indexes of [ 99m Tc]Tc-DPD imaging for cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Patients who underwent [ 99m Tc]Tc-DPD imaging with suspicion of CA were enrolled. On the planar image, myocardial uptake was visually graded using Perugini’s and Dorbala’s methods (PS and DS). As [ 99m Tc]Tc-DPD indexes, heart-to-whole body ratio (H/WB) and heart-to-contralateral lung ratio (H/CL) were measured on planar image. SUVmax, SUVmean, total myocardial uptake (TMU), and C-index were measured on SPECT/CT. Inter-observer agreement of the indexes and their association with visual grading and clinical factors were evaluated. A total of 152 [ 99m Tc]Tc-DPD images, of which 18 were positive, were analyzed. Inter-observer agreement was high for both DS (κ = 0.95) and PS (κ = 0.96). However, DS showed a higher correlation with quantitative indexes than PS. Inter-observer agreement was also high for SPECT/CT indexes, particularly SUVmax. SUVmax was significantly different between different DS groups ( P = 0.014–0.036), and showed excellent correlations with H/WB and H/CL ( r = 0.898 and 0.910). SUVmax also showed significant differences between normal, AL, and ATTR pathology ( P = 0.022–0.037), and a significant correlation with extracellular volume on cardiac MRI ( r = 0.772, P < 0.001). DS is a visual grading system for CA that is more significantly matched with quantitative indexes than PS. SUVmax is a reliable quantitative index on SPECT/CT, with a high inter-observer agreement, correlations with the visual grade, and potential association with cardiac MRI findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bae et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: