Key result
DeltaIVCD showed a strong positive correlation with stroke volume variation (r = 0.751) and its use for guiding fluid therapy maintained adequate tissue perfusion in low LVEF patients.
Why the study?
The study investigated the correlation between transoesophageal echocardiography-measured inferior venacaval index and stroke volume variation, and compared inferior venacaval index-guided versus stroke volume variation-guided fluid therapy in patients with poor LVEF undergoing cytoreductive oncosurgery.
Does DeltaIVCD-guided fluid therapy improve hemodynamic management compared to SVV-guided fluid therapy in patients with low LVEF undergoing major cytoreductive surgery?
RCT (n=70)
Simple computer generated randomisation
No
Does DeltaIVCD-guided fluid therapy improve hemodynamic management compared to SVV-guided fluid therapy in patients with low LVEF undergoing major cytoreductive surgery?
DeltaIVCD-guided fluid therapy using transesophageal echocardiography is a valuable and safe alternative to SVV-guided therapy for tight fluid control in patients with low LVEF undergoing major surgery.
May support DeltaIVCD-guided fluids in low LVEF patients; leaves open larger RCTs for outcome confirmation.
Background and Aims: This study aims to trans oesophageal echo cardiographically (TOE) measure inferior venacava diameter (IVCD) during inspiration and expiration in poor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) patients undergoing cytoreductive oncosurgery, to ascertain if any correlation exists between, caval index (DeltaIVCD), and stroke volume variation (SVV), and to compare DeltaIVCD-guided versus SVV-guided fluid therapy. Methods: In this prospective, parallel group, interventional study, seventy American Society of Anesthesiologists-III patients, aged 30-75 years, weighing 40-90 kg, with LVEF ≤40% undergoing cytoreductive surgery were included and randomised to group-D (DeltaIVCD-guided fluid therapy) and group-S (SVV-guided fluid therapy). Patients with oesophageal lesions were excluded. After standard endotracheal anaesthesia, arterial and internal jugular vein catheters were placed. A TOE probe was inserted in the interventional group-D. Quantification of IVCD respiratory variations was done. Heart rate (HR), arterial oxygen saturation (SPO 2 ), mean arterial pressure, end tidal carbondioxide (EtCO 2 ), central venous pressure, SVV, IVCD, and urine output (UO) were recorded every 30 min. Post-operative arterial blood gas analysis, lung-ultrasound, chest-radiograph, and serum creatinine were done. Statistical Analysis: Pearson’s correlation coefficient as measure of strength of linear relationship, calculation of regression equation, and unpaired t -test for normally distributed continuous variables were used. Results: A positive correlation between DeltaIVCD and SVV (r = 0.751) was observed. A regression equation was obtained for SVV (SVV = [0.317 × DeltaIVCD] + 5.877). Serum lactate, estimated glomerular filtration rate, HR, and UO were within normal limits in group-D. There was no pulmonary oedema. Conclusion: DeltaIVCD-guided intravenous fluid therapy is valuable in low LVEF patients where tight fluid control is essential and any fluid overload may precipitate cardiac failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤40%) undergoing cytoreductive oncosurgery (n=70). DeltaIVCD-guided fluid therapy vs. SVV-guided fluid therapy was evaluated on Correlation between DeltaIVCD and SVV (r = 0.751, p=<0.001). DeltaIVCD showed a strong positive correlation with stroke volume variation (r = 0.751) and its use for guiding fluid therapy maintained adequate tissue perfusion in low LVEF patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: