Key result
SVV-guided fluid therapy cuts intraoperative Ringer's acetate volume ~21% versus CVP guidance.
Why the study?
To investigate Electrical Cardiometry Stroke Volume Variation compared to Central Venous Pressure for guiding intraoperative fluids and their secondary effects on outcomes.
Does SVV-guided fluid therapy reduce intraoperative fluid volumes compared to CVP-guided therapy in adult patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy?
RCT (n=40)
Does SVV-guided fluid therapy reduce intraoperative fluid volumes compared to CVP-guided therapy in adult patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 4550% vs 5775%
p-value: p=≤0.001
SVV-guided fluid therapy significantly reduces intraoperative crystalloid and colloid volumes and improves postoperative oxygenation compared to CVP-guided therapy during pancreatico-duodenectomy.
SVV-guided fluid therapy reduces intraoperative crystalloid volumes in pancreaticoduodenectomy; extends RCT evidence favoring goal-directed over CVP guidance in major abdominal surgery.
Background: Aim was to investigate the Electrical Cardiometry (EC) Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) in comparison to Central Venous Pressure (CVP) for guiding intraoperative fluids. Secondarily effects on outcomes. Patients and Methods: 41 adult patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy (1 excluded) were randomly assigned to SVV gp (n=20) and CVP gp (n=20). Ringer’s Acetate infused intraoperative initial bolus 6 mL/kg then 3-6 ml/kg/h for both groups to keep SVV < 12% in SVV group or CVP 5-8 mmHg in CVP group, boluses of 3 ml/kg (max; 20 ml/kg) Albumin 5% if SVV persists > 12% in SVV group or CVP ≤5 mmHg in CVP group. SVV %, Thoracic Fluid Content (TFC) (%), Corrected Flow Time (FTc) (msec.), Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) dyn. sec.cm-5, Mean invasive blood pressure (MIBP) (mmHg), and fluid administered were recorded. Results: The total amount of Ringer acetate was 4550.00±916.23 Vs. 5775.00±678.14 ml, P ≤ 0.001 and albumin 5% 531.25± 85.39 Vs. 794.12± 237.75 ml, p≤ 0.001 in SVV and CVP groups respectively. The mean TFC was greater in the CVP group than SVV group; (27.99 ± 4.55 Vs 31.47 ± 4.73%; P= 0 .02). Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) and serum hemoglobin level were significantly better in SVV than CVP group. 13Vs 14 patients required noradrenaline support in SVV Vs CVP group (p=1.01). Conclusions: Significant reduction in the intraoperative volumes of both crystalloid and colloid, better postoperative oxygenation and serum hemoglobin as well as a reduction in thoracic fluid content in patients managed by SVV fluid managed protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Pancreatico-duodenectomy (n=40). Stroke Volume Variation (SVV) guided fluid therapy vs. Central Venous Pressure (CVP) guided fluid therapy was evaluated on Total amount of Ringer acetate administered (p=≤0.001). Stroke volume variation-guided fluid therapy significantly reduced intraoperative Ringer's acetate volume compared to central venous pressure guidance (4550 vs 5775 ml, P≤0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: