Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Driving is full of unpredictability and uncertainty. Standardized drive cycles, traditionally defined as velocity-time profiles, serve as test-beds for performance prediction. However, these generalized patterns do not offer real-life testing scenarios for every trip a vehicle might encounter during its life cycle. Thus, the “Journey Mapping” concept is highlighted in this paper, which redefines drive cycles more realistically as the journey of a vehicle from an origin to the destination is influenced by weather, terrain, traffic, driver behavior, road, and aerodynamic conditions. AMESim software simulations for a Ford Focus Electric 2012 were seen to predict energy consumption with about 5% error, on average, compared with the true vehicle values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Divakarla et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: