Key result
This review provides a comprehensive overview of classical and modern neuroanatomical tract-tracing tools, including PHA-L, BDA, and viral vectors, to guide experimental design in neuroscience.
Why the study?
Neuroanatomical tracing methods are fundamental for elucidating brain circuits, but with a rapidly expanding technical arsenal, advice and background are needed to guide the choice of optimal tracers.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of classical and modern neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques, including protocols and applications for multi-dimensional tracing.
May guide neuroanatomical tool selection in experiments; leaves open standardized validation of viral vectors versus classical tracers.
Neuroanatomical tracing methods remain fundamental for elucidating the complexity of brain circuits. During the past decades, the technical arsenal at our disposal has been greatly enriched, with a steady supply of fresh arrivals. This paper provides a landscape view of classical and modern tools for tract-tracing purposes. Focus is placed on methods that have gone viral, i.e., became most widespread used and fully reliable. To keep an historical perspective, we start by reviewing one-dimensional, standalone transport-tracing tools; these including today's two most favorite anterograde neuroanatomical tracers such as Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin and biotinylated dextran amine. Next, emphasis is placed on several classical tools widely used for retrograde neuroanatomical tracing purposes, where Fluoro-Gold in our opinion represents the best example. Furthermore, it is worth noting that multi-dimensional paradigms can be designed by combining different tracers or by applying a given tracer together with detecting one or more neurochemical substances, as illustrated here with several examples. Finally, it is without any doubt that we are currently witnessing the unstoppable and spectacular rise of modern molecular-genetic techniques based on the use of modified viruses as delivery vehicles for genetic material, therefore, pushing the tract-tracing field forward into a new era. In summary, here, we aim to provide neuroscientists with the advice and background required when facing a choice on which neuroanatomical tracer-or combination thereof-might be best suited for addressing a given experimental design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanciego et al. (2020) conducted a review in Neuroanatomical tract-tracing. Neuroanatomical tract-tracing techniques was evaluated. This review provides a comprehensive overview of classical and modern neuroanatomical tract-tracing tools, including PHA-L, BDA, and viral vectors, to guide experimental design in neuroscience.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: