Key result
Tachypacing-induced heart failure selectively increases right ventricular miR-221 expression ~2-fold over controls.
Why the study?
The failing right ventricle does not respond like the left ventricle to guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure, possibly because of interventricular differences in molecular pathophysiology.
Does tachypacing-induced biventricular heart failure cause distinct microRNA-21 and microRNA-221 expression and fibrotic stress responses in right versus left ventricular tissue and fibroblasts?
Does tachypacing-induced biventricular heart failure cause distinct microRNA-21 and microRNA-221 expression and fibrotic stress responses in right versus left ventricular tissue and fibroblasts?
Identifies distinct profibrotic microRNA (miR-21 and miR-221) stress responses specific to right ventricular fibroblasts in biventricular heart failure, offering a potential explanation for differential RV remodeling and treatment response.
RV-specific miR-21/221 upregulation in experimental HF may explain differential remodeling; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The failing right ventricle (RV) does not respond like the left ventricle (LV) to guideline-directed medical therapy of heart failure, perhaps due to interventricular differences in their molecular pathophysiology. METHODS: Using the canine tachypacing-induced biventricular heart failure (HF) model, we tested the hypothesis that interventricular differences in microRNAs (miRs) expression distinguish failing RV from failing LV. Microarray analysis of ventricular tissue revealed that miR-21 and miR-221, 2 activators of profibrotic and proliferative processes, increased the most, at 4- and 2-fold, respectively, in RV-HF versus RV-Control. Neither miR-21 or miR-221 was statistically significantly different in LV-HF versus LV-Control. These changes were accompanied by more extensive fibrosis in RV-HF than LV-HF. To test whether miR-21 and miR-221 upregulation is specific to RV cellular response to mechanical and hormonal stimuli associated with HF, we subjected fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes isolated from normal canine RV and LV to cyclic overstretch and aldosterone. These 2 stressors markedly upregulated miR-21 and miR-221 in RV fibroblasts but not in LV fibroblasts nor cardiomyocytes of either ventricle. Furthermore, miR-21/221 knockdown significantly attenuated RV but not LV fibroblast proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a novel, biological difference between RV and LV fibroblasts that might underlie distinctions in pathological remodeling of the RV in biventricular HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Powers et al. (2020) studied Tachypacing-induced biventricular heart failure (n=16). Left ventricular tachypacing (in vivo) and cyclic overstretch/aldosterone (in vitro) vs. Chronically instrumented dogs not subjected to cardiac pacing (non-failing controls) was evaluated on Differential expression of miR-21 and miR-221 in right ventricular failing tissue versus control (4-fold increase (miR-21) and 2-fold increase (miR-221), p=0.07 for miR-21; 0.01 for miR-221). Tachypacing-induced heart failure increased miR-21 by 4-fold (P=0.07) and miR-221 by 2-fold (P=0.01) in failing right ventricles compared to controls, with no significant change in left ventricles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: