Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A schedule-based approach, such as time division multiple access, is more efficient than a contention-based approach in terms of energy saving by switching sensors into sleeping mode. However, it does not use the transmission media effectively as each time slot is dedicated to a sensor and therefore cannot be used by others should it be idle. Moreover, a schedule-based approach requires a central node to manage and broadcast the schedule to other members, causing high delay and unscalability. On the other hand, contention-based protocols can be used in a distributed fashion. However, contention-based protocols such as IEEE 802.11 waste a lot of energy in idle listening. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach between contention- and schedule-based protocols. The preliminary results using simulation and a test bed show that our proposed approach uses transmission media more efficiently, leading to lower delay while preserving energy for wireless sensor networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: