Key result
Heart failure patients with sinus rhythm or ventricular extrasystoles exhibited significantly higher cardio-respiratory synchrony compared to healthy controls and patients with atrial fibrillation (p<0.01).
Why the study?
Little was known about how functional changes in one coupled physiological system induce functional changes in the other, particularly regarding their multiscale behavior.
Does multiscale entropy analysis reveal differences in cardio-respiratory coupling between heart failure patients and healthy subjects?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Does multiscale entropy analysis reveal differences in cardio-respiratory coupling between heart failure patients and healthy subjects?
p-value: p=<0.01
Primary alterations in cardiac rhythm regularity in heart failure patients result in changes in respiratory rhythm regularity and their level of synchrony.
Higher synchrony in HF with SR/VE is hypothesis-generating; leaves open its value as biomarker or therapeutic target.
It is known that in pathological conditions, physiological systems develop changes in the multiscale properties of physiological signals. However, in real life, little is known about how changes in the function of one of the two coupled physiological systems induce changes in function of the other one, especially on their multiscale behavior. Hence, in this work we aimed to examine the complexity of cardio-respiratory coupled systems control using multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis of cardiac intervals MSE (RR), respiratory time series MSE (Resp), and synchrony of these rhythms by cross multiscale entropy (CMSE) analysis, in the heart failure (HF) patients and healthy subjects. We analyzed 20 min of synchronously recorded RR intervals and respiratory signal during relaxation in the supine position in 42 heart failure patients and 14 control healthy subjects. Heart failure group was divided into three subgroups, according to the RR interval time series characteristics (atrial fibrillation (HFAF), sinus rhythm (HFSin), and sinus rhythm with ventricular extrasystoles (HFVES)). Compared with healthy control subjects, alterations in respiratory signal properties were observed in patients from the HFSin and HFVES groups. Further, mean MSE curves of RR intervals and respiratory signal were not statistically different only in the HFSin group (p = 0.43). The level of synchrony between these time series was significantly higher in HFSin and HFVES patients than in control subjects and HFAF patients (p < 0.01). In conclusion, depending on the specific pathologies, primary alterations in the regularity of cardiac rhythm resulted in changes in the regularity of the respiratory rhythm, as well as in the level of their asynchrony.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Platiša et al. (2020) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure (n=56). Heart failure vs. Healthy control subjects was evaluated on Synchrony of cardiac and respiratory rhythms by cross multiscale entropy (CMSE) analysis (p=<0.01). Heart failure patients with sinus rhythm or ventricular extrasystoles exhibited significantly higher cardio-respiratory synchrony compared to healthy controls and patients with atrial fibrillation (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: