Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro analysis demonstrates lactam bridges stabilize alpha-helices and drive dimerization, indicating hydrophobic face modifications control peptide assembly.
A series of lactam-bridged and linear 14 residue amphipathic alpha-helical peptides based on the sequence Ac-EXEALKKEXEALKK-amide were prepared in order to determine the effect of decreasing the hydrophobicity of the nonpolar face to helical content and stability. This was done by substituting position X by Ile, Val, and Ala. Lactam bridges spaced i to i + 4 were formed between the side chains of Glu3 and Lys7 and Glu10 and Lys14 while the linear noncyclized peptides could potentially form i to i + 4 salt bridges with the same residues. It was found that in all cases the lactam-bridged peptides were substantially more helical than the corresponding linear peptides as determined by CD spectroscopy. Moreover, the helical content approached 100% for the lactam-bridged peptides X = Ile and Ala and was greater than 80% for X = Val. For X = Ile and Val, this was partly due to the ability of the lactam bridges to enhance interchain interactions relative to the linear versions of the same sequence. Size-exclusion chromatography demonstrated that the Ile-based peptide associates as a dimer. The alanine-based lactam-bridged peptide was found to be monomeric as determined by concentration dependency studies and size-exclusion chromatography. Thermal denaturation studies in benign media indicated that the lactam-based peptides were very stable. The conformation of the Ala-based lactam peptide was further characterized by two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy and was found to be highly helical. The results demonstrate the ability of lactam bridges to stabilize the helical conformation and enhance dimerization of peptides based on a 3,4 hydrophobic heptad repeat. The substitution of Ala residues in the hydrophobic face of the alpha-helix can prevent dimerization and specify monomeric helical structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Houston et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: