Why the study?
Does intravenous amiodarone improve treatment success in patients with acute refractory arrhythmias?
Does intravenous amiodarone improve treatment success in patients with acute refractory arrhythmias?
Intravenous amiodarone is highly effective for refractory ventricular tachycardias, but less effective for ventricular fibrillation with severe congestive heart failure.
IV amiodarone success varies by subtype in refractory arrhythmias; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Few data are available on intravenous amiodarone therapy in refractory arrhythmias. This retrospective study in 50 patients (14 with supraventricular and 36 with ventricular tachyarrhythmias) revealed a favorable effect of intravenous amiodarone in the treatment of life-threatening arrhythmias with an overall success rate of 76%. In the subgroup of patients with ventricular fibrillation and concomitant severe congestive heart failure success rate was low (25%, 2/8), whereas effectiveness in patients with ventricular tachycardias was high (greater than 90%) and proved to be independent of left ventricular function. If patients with recurrent ventricular fibrillation were excluded from the analysis, successful treatment with intravenous amiodarone was achieved in 90%, even in those patients with severely compromised myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: