Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Targeting angiogenesis represents a cornerstone in the development of antitumoral therapy, yet the suboptimal responses and inevitable resistance significantly limit its clinical efficacy. To better understand the mechanisms underlying anti-angiogenic resistance, this study systematically characterized the pancancer angiogenic landscape based on 1.24 million individual cells across 13 cancer types. Our analyses revealed that pericytes (PCs) and PC-derived non-classical angiogenic factors PGF/ANGPT2 correlate with angiogenesis more prominently than the classical VEGFA-centric model. Tumor-educated PCs, namely MCAM + immature PCs (imPCs), were spatio-transcriptionally identified as the primary source of PGF/ANGPT2, driving alternative angiogenesis and serving as a major contributor to ɑVEGFR resistance. MCAM + imPCs were phenotypically shaped under the dysregulated Notch signaling and hypoxia stress. To address the limitations associated with single-targeted endothelial cells (ECs) inhibition via ɑVEGFR, we adopted MCAM-directed antibody-drug conjugate (MCAM ADC) to specifically eliminate pro-angiogenic PCs, whose combination with ɑVEGFR showed enhanced anti-angiogenic effects. This dual-targeting approach demonstrated superior tumor control, offering MCAM ADC as a promising translational solution to circumvent anti-angiogenic resistance. Overall, our findings redefine the mechanisms of angiogenic resistance and suggest a dual EC/PC inhibition strategy for more effective anticancer therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: