Key result
This is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating goal-directed hemodynamic therapy in neurosurgery; no results are available.
Why the study?
Current knowledge regarding the effect of fluid management on patient-orientated outcomes in neurosurgery is limited.
Does goal-directed hemodynamic therapy guided by non-invasive monitoring reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures?
RCT
Randomized
Does goal-directed hemodynamic therapy guided by non-invasive monitoring reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures?
This study protocol outlines an RCT to evaluate whether non-invasive goal-directed hemodynamic therapy improves safety and reduces complications in neurosurgical patients.
Introduction: Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy aims to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Optimal preload is mandatory to achieve adequate cardiac output and oxygen supply to organs and tissues. Neurosurgical patients are at risk of inadequate preload, decreased blood flow and reduced oxygen delivery, all of which can lead to organ dysfunction. Current knowledge regarding the effect of fluid management on patient-orientated outcomes in neurosurgery is limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the safety and feasibility of goal-directed therapy with standard management in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Methods and analysis: Patients undergoing neurosurgical operation will be randomised into two groups. Therapy in the first group of patients will be guided by standard perioperative monitoring. In the second group, perioperative therapy will be guided using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in addition to standard monitoring. Administration of fluids and vasoactive drugs will depend on the assessment of stroke volume variation and cardiac index. The safety of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy protocol will be assessed by comparing incidences of adverse events between groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hrdý et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Neurosurgical procedures. Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy guided by non-invasive monitoring vs. Standard perioperative monitoring was evaluated on Incidences of adverse events. This is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating goal-directed hemodynamic therapy in neurosurgery; no results are available.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: