Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mainstream financial institutions have never been able to provide generally prevailing service levels in poor communities. In the resulting partial-service vacuum, blacks invented numbers gambling. Numbers-gambling banks became sources of capital and a major savings device of urban black communities. In conjunction with the usury industry, numbers banks framed an alternative institutional system for the savings-investment cycle in the slum. Numbers banking illustrates the conjoint contribution of institutional and cultural causes in analysis of poverty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivan Light (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: