Key result
Color-flow Doppler detects internal carotid pseudo-occlusions at ~94% accuracy vs. 27% with gray-scale duplex.
Observational
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine the impact of color-flow Doppler on the accuracy of noninvasive carotid imaging for distinguishing an internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion (string sign) from a complete occlusion. METHODS: From January 1985 to January 1994, review of noninvasive vascular studies, arteriograms, and operative reports of 26 consecutive patients undergoing 27 carotid endarterectomies for carotid pseudo-occlusion was performed. Further review was conducted of all patients identified with carotid occlusion by noninvasive testing who underwent confirmatory arteriography during the same interval. RESULTS: Conventional gray-scale duplex scanning (January 1985 to December 1989) correctly identified 3 of 11 (27%) pseudo-occluded internal carotid arteries compared with 15 of 16 (94%) internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusions correctly identified by color-flow Doppler (January 1990 to June 1994) (P < .01). Similarly, carotid occlusion was more accurately identified by color-flow Doppler (33 of 33, 100%) compared with gray-scale duplex scanning (19 of 27, 90%) (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of color-flow Doppler to the duplex evaluation of the extracranial carotid circulation improves the accuracy of distinguishing carotid pseudo-occlusion from the occluded internal carotid artery and may obviate the need for arteriography to identify patients with this critical level of carotid stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berman et al. (1995) conducted an observational in Carotid artery pseudo-occlusion and occlusion. Color-flow Doppler vs. Conventional gray-scale duplex scanning was evaluated on Correct identification of pseudo-occluded internal carotid arteries (p=< .01). Color-flow Doppler accurately identified 94% of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusions, compared with only 27% using conventional gray-scale duplex scanning (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: