OBJECTIVES: To describe the curriculum of a mandatory, fourth-year geriatrics clerkship and assess its impact on medical students' knowledge of geriatric medicine and attitudes toward the elderly. DESIGN: One group, before/after trial. SETTING: Mount Sinai School of Medicine of the City University of New York. PARTICIPANTS: Entire fourth year class of medical students (n = 127). INTERVENTION: Four-week-long clinical geriatrics clerkship. MEASUREMENTS: Pre- and post-rotation: test of knowledge; Aging Semantic Differential (ASD) attitude scale; Modified Maxwell-Sullivan attitude scale; questionnaire. MAIN RESULTS: Seventy percent of students found the rotation to be educationally valuable; however, only one-third of students would have taken the clerkship had it not been required. Mean geriatric knowledge score increased by 18.7% (P less than 0.001). Mean ASD attitude score did not change significantly (130.5 +/- 19.2 pre-rotation versus 126.6 +/- 18.8 post-rotation, P = 0.15), but students started the rotation with a neutral attitude. Over 90% of students agreed they would welcome elderly into their future practice. CONCLUSION: If a national curricular goal is to improve medical students' knowledge of geriatric medicine, required rather than elective rotations may be in order.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fields et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: