Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A total of 389 children (age 0.6-10.2 years) with typical signs and symptoms of acute otitis media were randomized (1:1) to treatment with either azithromycin or co-amoxiclav. The dosage schedule for azithromycin was 10 mg/kg/day, in a single daily dose, administered for three days. Co-amoxiclav was given at a dose of 13.3 mg/kg (amoxycillin equivalent) tid for ten days. Patients were evaluated 4-6 days and 12-16 days after the start of therapy. A satisfactory clinical response was reported for 93.2% of the 192 evaluable azithromycin-treated patients (144 cured, 35 improved), and for 97.3% of the 189 evaluable co-amoxiclav-treated patients (148 cured, 36 improved). Six (3.0%) relapses occurred in the azithromycin group, and four (2.1%) in the co-amoxiclav treatment group, respectively. Side-effects were recorded in a significantly fewer number of the azithromycin patients (23 of 197; 11.7%) compared with the co-amoxiclav patients (43 of 192; 22.4%, P < 0.02). Adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal in nature, with diarrhoea the most frequent complaint (32 cases with co-amoxiclav; five with azithromycin; P < 0.001). One patient from each group discontinued therapy because of treatment-related adverse events. Laboratory analyses (mainly haematological in nature) showed abnormalities in six of 100 azithromycin patients and ten of 101 co-amoxiclav patients. It was concluded that three-day, single-dose azithromycin and ten-day tid co-amoxiclav therapy have comparable clinical efficacy in paediatric patients with acute otitis media; however, there was a lower incidence of side effects in the azithromycin group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
U. B. Schaad (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: