Key result
An RT-led home COPD disease management program significantly reduced 30-day readmission rates compared to standard of care (12.2% vs 22.3%; OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70; P<.001).
Why the study?
Decreasing hospital readmissions for COPD exacerbation improves health and reduces resource utilization, prompting evaluation of whether an RT-led home disease management program could reduce readmissions.
Does an RT-led home COPD disease management program reduce 30-day readmission rates in patients discharged after COPD exacerbation?
Cohort (n=1,093)
Does an RT-led home COPD disease management program reduce 30-day readmission rates in patients discharged after COPD exacerbation?
Odds Ratio: 0.48 (95% CI 0.33–0.7)
Absolute Event Rate: 12.2% vs 22.3%
p-value: p=<.001
An RT-led home COPD disease management program significantly reduces 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmission rates for patients discharged after a COPD exacerbation.
May support RT-led home COPD programs to cut readmissions; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: In 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services limited payments to hospitals with high readmission rates for patients admitted with COPD exacerbation. Decreasing readmissions in this patient population improves patient health and decreases health care utilization of resources. We hypothesized a COPD disease management program delivered by a respiratory therapist (RT) in the patient’s home may reduce readmission rates for COPD exacerbation. METHODS: We performed a pre/post interventional study comparing hospital readmissions for subjects with COPD exacerbation that received standard of care in the home versus an RT-led home COPD disease management program. Subjects discharged home from Atlantic Health System with COPD exacerbation were enrolled in the pre-intervention group. Subsequently, an evidence-based home COPD disease management program was implemented by an RT from At Home Medical in the home. The home COPD Disease Management Program was implemented from April 2017–September 2019, and this served as the post-intervention group. The primary end point was readmission rates at 30 d. Secondary end points included 60-d and 90-d readmission rates. RESULTS: A total of 1,093 participants were included in the study, 658 in the pre-intervention cohort and 435 participants in the post-intervention group. Approximately 22.3% ( n = 147) of subjects in the pre-intervention group was readmitted within 30 d of discharge compared to 12.2% ( n = 53) in the post-intervention group ( P < .001). A reduction in 60-d (33.9% vs 12.0%, P < .001) and 90-d all-cause readmissions (43.5% vs 13.1%, P < .001) was also seen. Participation in the COPD Disease Management Program was significantly associated with decreased 30-, 60-, and 90-d readmission rates adjusting for age, gender, race, ethnicity, and smoking status (odds ratio 0.48 [95% CI 0.33–0.70]; odds ratio 0.26 [95% CI 0.18–0.38]; odds ratio 0.20 [95% CI 0.14–0.27]; P < .001, for all 3 readmission rates). CONCLUSIONS: The COPD Disease Management Program is significantly associated with decreased readmission adjusting for demographics and smoking status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truumees et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in COPD exacerbation (n=1,093). RT-led home COPD disease management program vs. Standard of care in the home was evaluated on Readmission rates at 30 days (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70, p=<.001). An RT-led home COPD disease management program significantly reduced 30-day readmission rates compared to standard of care (12.2% vs 22.3%; OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.70; P<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: