Key result
Modified ResNet34 model predicts SBP using PPG signals within ~6 mmHg mean absolute error.
Why the study?
Existing intermittent blood pressure measurement methods do not fully reflect real blood pressure status and cannot eliminate the restraining feeling of a cuff.
Can a deep learning network based on ResNet34 accurately predict continuous blood pressure using only PPG signals?
Can a deep learning network based on ResNet34 accurately predict continuous blood pressure using only PPG signals?
A modified ResNet34 deep learning model can accurately predict continuous blood pressure from PPG signals, meeting established clinical standards and showing potential for wearable device integration.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has become a common health problem of mankind, and the prevalence and mortality of CVD are rising on a year-to-year basis. Blood pressure (BP) is an important physiological parameter of the human body and also an important physiological indicator for the prevention and treatment of CVD. Existing intermittent measurement methods do not fully indicate the real BP status of the human body and cannot get rid of the restraining feeling of a cuff. Accordingly, this study proposed a deep learning network based on the ResNet34 framework for continuous prediction of BP using only the promising PPG signal. The high-quality PPG signals were first passed through a multi-scale feature extraction module after a series of pre-processing to expand the perceptive field and enhance the perception ability on features. Subsequently, useful feature information was then extracted by stacking multiple residual modules with channel attention to increase the accuracy of the model. Lastly, in the training stage, the Huber loss function was adopted to stabilize the iterative process and obtain the optimal solution of the model. On a subset of the MIMIC dataset, the errors of both SBP and DBP predicted by the model met the AAMI standards, while the accuracy of DBP reached Grade A of the BHS standard, and the accuracy of SBP almost reached Grade A of the BHS standard. The proposed method verifies the potential and feasibility of PPG signals combined with deep neural networks in the field of continuous BP monitoring. Furthermore, the method is easy to deploy in portable devices, and it is more consistent with the future trend of wearable blood-pressure-monitoring devices (e.g., smartphones and smartwatches).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2023) studied Continuous blood pressure monitoring in intensive care unit patients. Modified ResNet34 deep learning model (MSA-ResNet) using photoplethysmography (PPG) signals vs. Invasive arterial blood pressure (ABP) reference and baseline ResNet34 model was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) prediction (mmHg) (MD -1.89 mmHg (SBP MAE: 5.98 mmHg, DBP MAE: 3.24 mmHg; SBP ME±SD: 0.92±7.79 mmHg, DBP ME±SD: 0.68±4.94 mmHg)). The modified ResNet34 model using PPG signals predicted blood pressure with MAEs of 5.98 mmHg for SBP and 3.24 mmHg for DBP, meeting AAMI error standards.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: